When is it OK to take a photo in a public space?
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case called Brown v.
Board of Education.
In this case, the justices will determine whether the constitutional right to photograph in public spaces is an individual right or an individual liberty right.
The issue of whether the right to take photos in public is a fundamental right that can be protected in all circumstances is important, because it affects people’s ability to exercise their right to assemble.
In the United States, public places are not just places that people can go to take pictures, but also spaces that are used for the expression of ideas and other purposes.
For example, the courts have upheld the right of an assembly to assemble to express their political views or to express an unpopular opinion.
The right to free speech is an important liberty interest that should not be compromised for the purpose of facilitating expressive activity, says Matthew G. Schreiber, a professor of law at Rutgers Law School and a founding member of the University of California’s Schreier Law Clinic.
“The fundamental right to assembly is a core element of the Bill of Rights, and its protection should not depend on the location of the venue.”
While the right has been considered a fundamental liberty interest since the 19th century, the legal standard that courts use to determine whether it is protected by the First Amendment has changed over time.
In 1960, the court held that the right is not limited to the public square.
“We have now come to the point where we’re talking about a private property right in the public sphere,” says Stephen A. Rothbard, a lawyer at the libertarian Cato Institute.
“So if you’re a business or a government agency, you can exercise that right in your business or government facilities.”
But the Supreme